| Welcome | |
|---|---|
| Welcome to dallashistory You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today! We consist of current and former residents of the Dallas, Texas area. However, discussions vary widely about Dallas, History, Technology and wide topics from across the planet. |
|
Moderator: survivingworldsteam
Bill Crane wrote:Thank you. This is really interesting.
I don't know the RR terms, but I take it you could "dump" the firbox contents on the right of way ? Also, is to "unload" to exhaust the boiler to the atmosphere? Or?
In a coal burning locomotive, if faced with a low water situation, you are faced with an emergency and yes, you would dump the fire (the burning coal in the firebox) right there on the right of way, the roadbed. Accepting the risk of setting the ties on fire.
In this context, "unload" means jump off the engine so as to avoid death or injury when (or if) the boiler exploded.
Were there water level indicators in addition to the low water alarm? If so were was the system redundant? Were the low water alarms ever subject to repeated malfunctions such that the operating crew might blow off a warning?
The primary indicator of the amount of water in a boiler were what are known as "water glasses" or "sight glasses" - transparent tubes on the boiler back-head with silvered rear surfaces in which you could see the water level. Low water alarms were a fairly late development in steam locomotive practice and as far as I know, were (simply by virtue of their operation) not prone to give a false positive - but soimetiems they didn't work at all leading to a false sense of confidence.
Sight glasses aren't perfect though - read the report of teh boiler explosion on teh Gettysburg Railroad a few years ago, or the one on the SP 4-10-2 found in THREE BARRELS OF STEAM.
Did the operating crew keep a log that was a source of corrective maintenance? Were maintenance records reviewed after such a mishap?.
Clyde Howard wrote:Well, you don't (or didn't) have manuals for operation of steam locomotives. The engineers learned by being on the job, as a fireman, then an extra board engineer, and usually a lot of roundhouse talk with more experienced hands.
If you got a low water alarm, I understand the usual thing was to dump the fire, try to get the injectors and/or feed water pumps or both working and generally try to cut the train off and run for the nearest tank. Or cut the train off and unload or maybe just unload, since a boiler explosion won't usually result in trouble for the train unless it derails when everything goes into emergency.
Bill Crane wrote:Steam powered road vehicles such as Doble, Stanley and White used a different type boiler, right?
But not steam powered farm equipment?
Last Updated: Monday, October 19, 2009 | 4:16 PM ET
Three workers were injured, one seriously, when a boiler exploded at a heating plant near the Supreme Court of Canada in Ottawa Monday.
Paramedics at the scene said one man has second-degree burns to 50 per cent of his body and a severe head laceration. He is reported in serious condition in hospital.
Another man has first-degree burns and is in stable condition while the third has minor injuries, paramedics said.
Firefighters evacuated 27 people from the heating plant, which supplies heat to buildings on Parliament Hill.
They said it wasn't yet clear when people could return to work in the building because the explosion was so strong it cracked one wall. They are also worried about the presence of asbestos.
"We see exterior damage to the building," said Kim Ayotte, chief of special operations for the Ottawa Fire Service. "There is damage to the facia, explosive damage to the vent louvres."
A hazardous materials team has been brought in to make sure no toxic substances were released by the blast.
Last Updated: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 | 4:59 PM ET
A 51-year-old man has died of injuries sustained in a boiler explosion at a plant that heats the Parliament Buildings.
A hazmat team from the Office of the Ontario Fire Marshal entered the heating plant to monitor its air quality a day after an explosion there. (Rebecca Zandbergen/CBC)
The man had suffered second-degree burns to 60 per cent of his body, paramedics said at the time of the explosion.
Police confirmed the death Tuesday, a day after the noon-hour explosion at the century-old heating plant behind the Supreme Court of Canada. The man's identity has not been released.
Another man received first-degree burns in the blast while a third had minor injuries. Most of the other 20 or so employees at the plant were not hurt.
The Cliff Street plant supplied heat via underground pipes to 52 buildings in Ottawa's core, along Wellington and Sparks streets and as far away as the Byward Market and the headquarters of the Department of National Defence on Colonel By Drive.
On Tuesday, a mask-wearing hazmat team from the Office of the Ontario Fire Marshal entered the building to monitor its air quality as grim-faced plant employees stood outside.
The building has been declared structurally sound. However, concerns remained about the effect of the explosion on asbestos wrapped around the pipes inside. Wayne Romaine, spokesman for the fire marshal's office, said crews will also be checking levels of carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulphide.
The Technical Standards and Safety Authority, the Ontario agency that licences boilers, was also on the scene investigating Tuesday.
Investigators said they hope the power to the plant will be turned back on at some point so they can download data from the plant's computers.
As of noon, Public Works and Government Services Canada had not yet commented on the incident.
On Tuesday, the plant was offline and heat was being supplied to the affected buildings from a plant at the Government Printing Bureau in Gatineau.
In a memo to Parliament Hill staff, a senior official at the House of Commons said the explosion's impact on employees working in the buildings would likely be minimal, as outdoor temperatures remain mild. A high of 14 C was predicted Tuesday by CBC climatologist Ian Black.
Return to Technological History
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests