Welcome
Welcome to dallashistory

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!

We consist of current and former residents of the Dallas, Texas area. However, discussions vary widely about Dallas, History, Technology and wide topics from across the planet.

Penny Farthing

From steam power to the space program, this forum discusses technology and it's history, with a focus on technology related to Dallas, but not limited to Dallas. Please, no computer-tech talk. Moderated by James (survivingworldsteam)

Moderator: survivingworldsteam

Penny Farthing

Postby survivingworldsteam on Mon Jul 27, 2009 1:49 pm

Some background: the first bicycle was invented by France's Comte de Sivrac in 1797. Named the Celeripede; it was no more than two wheels mounted in a rigid frame; the wooden frame was carved in the shape of an animal such as a horse, bird, or snake. The rider propelled it by walking with their feet on the ground; steering was done by leaning.

Germany's Baron von Drais introduced the Draisienne or "Hobby Horse" in 1818. It improved on the Celeripede by offering a steerable front wheel; but the driver still "walked" to propel it instead of pedaling. To put things in a historical perspective, the first steam powered locomotives, boats and road vehicles also began to appear at this time. Beethoven was composing his Ninth Symphony during the later period of his life, and Napoleon was being held captive by the British after his defeat at the Battle of Waterloo; an event captured by a budding artist named J. M. W. Turner.

Kirkpatrick MacMillan, a Scottish blacksmith, introduced the Velocipede in 1839. It improved on the "Hobby Horse" by allowing the rider to power the rear wheel through a series of pedals and levers. A later version of the Velocipede improved the design still further by allowing the rider to pedal the front wheels directly; it was also known as the "Boneshaker."

Like its contemporary, the steam locomotive; the velocipede’s speed was limited by how fast it’s “engine” could turn the pedals. So, like the steam locomotive, the driving wheel was made larger to enable it to go faster. About 1870, James Starley, described as the father of the bicycle industry, and others began producing bicycles based on the French boneshaker but with front wheels of increasing size, as large as 1.5 m (60 in) in diameter. At the time, it was just called a bicycle; but after it had faded in popularity, it became known as a “Penny Farthing.” The name came from the resemblance of it’s two different size wheels to an English Penny coin leading a Farthing coin.

Image

Thanks to all of you for your kind words regarding my Viscount; to me, these were the most beautiful bikes ever made. The owner of the last bike shop I worked at had one of these on display in his story window; he told me he would ride it in parades. I admired that big wheel as it sat in the window, but never had the nerve to even ask to ride it, much less try. I dreamed I owned one this past weekend; and that is what inspired me to study them.

A common question is how do you get on. In the picture above; notice the step on the left side of the frame, just above the rear wheel. You would put your left foot on it, hold the handlebars with your hands, then push off with your right foot. You would then either sit on the saddle and position your feet on the pedals, or put your right foot on the pedal, then sit down and place your left foot on the pedal. I have seen two different dismounting techniques -- some folks simply leap off the back and land on both feet while holding on to the handlebars. The other, more graceful technique is to put your left foot on the step, and swing your right foot down onto the ground.

You can just see the brake in this picture – it is a spoon shaped plate that the rider could press onto the front tire to slow it down. Like a track bike, you could also apply a backwards force to the pedals to try and slow it down.

Image

Notice in this ca. 1887 color print from the Library of Congress website that one of the riders has his legs on the handlebar as he comes downhill. I thought this was suicidal, until it was pointed out that by doing so, the rider may be able to land on his feet and run out of the way, should the bike “take a header" and propel the rider over the handlebars. If the rider did not do so, their legs would become tangled with the handlebars, and they would land flat on their face.

A Penny Farthing would have cost $100 in the 1870s; that would be about $10,000 today. So, only the urban well-to-do could afford them; and women's fashion of the day prevented them from riding as well. (Notice the lady in the print above riding a three wheeler.) But they introduced the cycling hobby of today, along with the concept of lesure and conspicuous consumption, at the same time their brethern were working in the "dark Satan mills."

In one of those twists of history, the nephew of James Starley, John Kemp Starley, invented the Safety bike in 1885. This bike looks like a bike of today, with equal size wheels and the rear wheel driven by a sprocket and chain. From that point forward, the Penny Farthing became known as an Ordinary, to distinguish it from the Safety bike. After the invention of the pneumatic tire in 1888; the Penny Farthing was considered obsolete, and the last ones were produced in 1893.

Now, you might think that is the end of the story, but it is not. There is a resurgence in Penny Farthing riding taking place. Some are riding the remaining antique examples; but at least two firms are still building them today.

http://www.hiwheel.com/

http://worksmancycles.com/shopsite_sc/store/html/page38.html

There are several good videos of Penny Farthings/Ordinarys on youtube. One shows a neat event in Canada where not only do you see lots of riders riding Penny Farthings; but one or two riders riding boneshakers. Each February in Evandale, Tasmania, penny-farthing enthusiasts from around the world converge on the small village for a series of Penny Farthing races, including the national championship. I noticed that many racers wear toe clips, which lock your feet to the pedals and enable you to lift on the pedals as well as push, but would make a graceful escape in the event they “take a header” almost impossible!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penny-farthing
User avatar
survivingworldsteam
 
Posts: 871
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Penny Farthing

Postby Bill Crane on Mon Jul 27, 2009 2:11 pm

Those things have always looked really scarry to me!
Bill Crane
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 7:30 am

Re: Penny Farthing

Postby survivingworldsteam on Wed Jul 29, 2009 3:36 pm

I must confess; in a fit of temporary(?) insanity, I am contemplating buying one of these. But in order to do so, I researched what size it should be, and how riding it would compare with my current Viscount bike.

The first measurement needed is the size of the front wheel. If you get a bike that has a wheel that is too small, you end up hitting your knees on the handlebars – there is little to no adjustment on the seat position; and just sometimes an adjustment to the crank length. Too large, and you can barely reach the pedals when they are the furthest distance from the seat; if you see someone pedaling on their tip toes, they are riding a Penny Farthing that is too big.

My inseam is 34 inches; if you allow for a five inch crank, and some space between the wheel, the down tube, and the seat, a proper wheel size is either 50, 52, or 54 inches; depending on how close everything is together. A 52 inch front wheel is about right.

When the Safety bike first came out, riders who were used to Penny Farthings needed a way to compare the two. What they came up with is the gear inch. The gear inch was the size of front wheel on a Penny Farthing you would need to get the same gearing as you get on a Safety bike.

The gear inch is calculated by dividing the ratio of the number of teeth on the front sprocket by the number of teeth on the rear sprocket; times the diameter of the rear wheel. Since my bike is a ten speed (with two sprockets up front, and five in the back), it has ten different gear inch combinations:

Code: Select all
47.3   58.5
54.0   66.9
63.0   78.0
70.9   87.8
81.0   100.3


So, the combination of the smaller sprocket in front and the next-to-largest sprocket in back are close to a 52 inch front wheel on a Penny Farthing. The combination of the largest sprocket in front and the smallest in back is equivalent to a 100 inch front wheel; the largest that I have heard of to date is 64 inches; with 60 inches being more realistic. So, while racing Penny Farthings persisted until the 1920s; the safety bike eventually persevered because it was impossible to gear Penny Farthings any higher (without resorting to something complicated like crank levers or planetary gears in the hub like a three speed.)

Now, a good steady pedaling speed is 90 RPM. Most riders to ride up to 120 RPM for brief bursts. So, the fastest you can pedal my Viscount in each gear at 120 RPM is as follows (all in MPH):

Code: Select all
16.8   20.8
19.2   21.8
22.4   27.8
25.4   31.4
29.0   35.8


I thought top gear at top speed was pretty fast. :o On a 52 inch diameter Penny Farthing, 120 RPM will result in a speed of 18.5 MPH. About half as fast as my Viscount (not taking into consideration about 10 pounds additional weight and more wind drag from the upright riding position); still way faster than I would want to go. I may be insane, but I am not stupid. :wink:

Gear inches have been used for about 100 years; but the formula does not take into consideration the length of the pedal cranks. If you have long cranks; you will be able to mash harder on the pedals, but not turn them as fast; the opposite is true for shorter cranks.

So, a chap named Sheldon Brown came up with something called the "gain ratio". It is the ratio of the crank length to the radius of the drive wheel, times the ratio of the front to the rear sprocket. Since all of the units cancel out; it is a dimensionaless number; however, it is not as easy to grasp as a gear inch, so it is not widely used. But, when you are comparing two bikes with different size cranks, it is a more useful number.

Sheldon Brown was kind enough to provide a online calculator, which I used to whip up all of these numbers for my Viscount:

http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/

My Viscount has cranks 170 mm (approx. 6 3/4") long, and 700 x 32 tires (approx. 27 inch diameter) on it. So, plugging these along with number of teeth on each sprocket; I come up with the following gain ratios:

Code: Select all
6.1   7.5
5.7   7.0
5.0   6.2
4.5   5.5
4.0   5.0


The gear that I like riding in the most on flat ground is the largest gear in front, and the next-to-smallest in the back; which has a gain ratio of 5.5

Penny Farthings had much smaller cranks than Safety bikes. Some of them also allowed you to adjust the length of the crank; the one adjustment you could make for your inseam size. You see both of those features in the drawing above.

Somewhere in my reading, I came up with a crank length of 5 inches. Since Penny Farthings don't have gears, the gain ratio is easy to calculate: 26/5 = 5.2. (You are only measuring one crank arm, so you should use the radius of the wheel instead of the diameter.) That is very close to the 5.5 I like to use on my Viscount; so a Penny Farthing with 52 inch front wheel and 5 inch cranks would have close to the same feel on the pedals as my Viscount in my favorite gear on level ground; but I would only go half as fast for the same amount of effort. (No problem there, riding a Penny Farthing is about riding slow and enjoying the ride; not hunched over staring at a patch of ground just in front of your front wheel, pedaling as fast as you can. :) )

Next step is try some of the local hills on my Viscount in the gear that corresponds to a Penny Farthing, and verify I can keep up on the pedals. I have NO desire to come flying downhill either with my feet spread out so they won't tangle with the pedals, or my legs on the handlebar in the hope I can leap off when it "takes a header." :shock:
User avatar
survivingworldsteam
 
Posts: 871
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Penny Farthing

Postby survivingworldsteam on Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:05 am

This race may not be as grueling as the Tour de France; but given what I posted above, a 12-14 MPH for 100-200 miles on a solid tire Penny Farthing is quite an achievement!

Big Wheels Keep On Turnin'
Proud owners of antique bicycles rolled into the IVCA world championships for vintage racing
Sally Guard

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/ ... /index.htm

A millisecond after Steve Carter had flown over the handlebars and landed on his helmeted head on the macadam track five feet below, he watched his hard-tire highwheel bicycle gyrate farthing over penny above him and sail out of view. Carter wondered whether he had made a mistake by riding a 100-year-old, prizewinning showpiece in this 200-meter sprint. But these were the 11th International Veteran Cycle Association (IVCA) World Championships, and racing antique bikes was the reason that Carter and 62 other competitors from 11 countries had come to Findlay, Ohio, for five days in June. Besides, their bikes were built to last.

Carter fell into his predicament after placing third in a 200-meter heat. Michael Gabrick, who was fourth in the heat, was in Lane 1, just inside Carter, when they crossed the finish line. As the two riders approached the first curve on the University of Findlay's 400-meter running track, Carter says, Gabrick apparently failed to start his turn quickly enough, and his pedal met Carter's spokes, resulting in a spectacular sprawl of century-old technology and somewhat younger humanity.

A few minutes later an unscathed Gabrick offered his apologies to Carter, who was still lying supine on the track but was only slightly bloodied. "How are our bikes?" he asked Gabrick, still unaware that the five-foot-tall front wheel of his highwheeler now looked like a soft pretzel and would cost $300 to fix. Carter's hopes of competing in the following race were dashed when officials started it sooner than he could gather his wits and another bike.

Not that Carter hadn't already made the most of the week. A 47-year-old assistant fire chief from Plainfield, Ind., he had ridden the 240 miles to Findlay on the highwheeler he would use in the 200. Known as the penny-farthing in England (because of the large wheel in the front and a small one in the rear) and as the Ordinary in the U.S. (because it was so commonly used), this model had its heyday from 1880 to 1890.

Carter's wife, Carolyn, a real estate broker, drove from Plainfield on Wednesday with one antique tricycle and seven two-wheelers from their collection of pre-1917 cycles, which they planned to ride in a full slate of races, parades and games associated with the IVCA championships and the concurrent annual meeting of The Wheelmen. One thousand members strong, The Wheelmen is a 24-year-old organization dedicated to preserving the history and tradition of high-wheelers and other antique bikes.

On Thursday, 66 collectors gathered for the Century Ride, a 100-mile rally on hard-tire (as opposed to inflatable-tire) highwheelers. After the trek from Plain-field, Carter decided to skip the Century to save his energy for the two days of competition to come.

As it turned out, that wasn't a bad idea. High winds and 92� heat caused all but 29 of the cyclists to drop out of the Century, which took place on a rural circuit just outside Findlay. Jacques Graber, 39, a geologist and environmental specialist with the California Lands Commission, finished first on one of the five highwheelers in his collection of 101 classic bikes. In 1990, Graber set the Australasian century record with a time of seven hours and 48 minutes, and in 1989 he set the German double-century (200-mile) mark with a time of 14:30 for what actually turned out to be a 206-mile ride. But on this steams day, Graber was happy to complete the 100-miler in 8:30.

The first race of the championships was the 30K on Friday, and it took place on the same roads outside Findlay. Eleven competitors rode safety bikes (with wheels of equal size, safeties are the precursors of today's models), 12 riders were on Ordinaries, and two rode Eagles, another type of highwheeler. Ordinaries and Eagles both have one enormous wheel and one small one, but on the Eagle the big wheel is in the rear. An Ordinary obliges the rider to pedal as well as steer the unwieldy large wheel, whereas an Eagle has rear-wheel drive and front-wheel steering. Eagles thus tend to be some-what faster and more maneuverable than Ordinaries.

The pneumatic-tire safeties would start first, followed in two minutes by the hard-lire safeties. After another three minutes the hard-tire highwheelers would set out. Hard-tire bikes ride considerably less swiftly and comfortably than their pneumatic-tire counterparts, a fact that Carolyn Carter, one of the two hard-tire safety riders entered, attested to as she waited to start. "You don't have to worry about me lapping any of those pea-new-matics," she told the spectators. She was right, but she still finished a respectable 10 minutes after Keith Pariani, who rode the other hard-tire safety. Pariani's time of 1:27:30 was a half hour off those of the top pneumatic bikers.

Phil Scott, 40, a former decathlete from Dayton, was powerful enough to break the wind for the five-man pneumatic safety peloton throughout much of the 30K and sustain an agonizingly long sprint to win in 57:28. Scott showed his fidelity to his hometown by riding the 1904 Dayton safety bike that he had finished restoring only the day before. Steve Carter placed third, 11 seconds back.

"A mile from the finish," said a winded Scott afterward, "I saw all these people up ahead on highwheelers, and I thought they were spectators at the finish line. So I started my sprint!" The highwheelers were actually some of the stragglers completing their second of three 10K laps.

Ten minutes after Scott's victory, five highwheelers streaked toward the finish, each rider's body bent far over his handlebars as he strained for additional speed. A heated Ordinary-versus-Eagle battle developed as Ross Hill, a 39-year-old manager of product engineering for the Motor Wheel Corporation in Lansing. Mich., furiously pedaled his Ordinary to the finish against Jamie Woodward, a Digital Equipment computer engineer from Merrimack, N.H. The techie on the Eagle won by a second, but Hill still took Ordinary honors.

Woodward's wife, Lora, also a computer engineer, placed eighth overall, and first among the women, in the highwheel category. The Woodwards' is the ideal Wheelmen romance. They were introduced by their parents, all of whom are avid antique bike collectors and riders.

While exuberance over bike collecting predominates at Wheelmen and IVCA events, the element of competition is what gives them grit. After his disappointing second-place finish to Hill in the Ordinary division of the 30K, Graber not only expounded on the joy of riding old bikes but also rationalized his defeat.

"I drove here from Sacramento, and I want to do everything I can," said Graber, who pointed out with a smile that while he was grinding it out in the Century the previous day, Hill was resting. Other healthy rivalries would be revealed the next day.

Saturday began with the 1,200-meter men's hard-tire safety race. Walter Branche, a bike historian who works for Schwinn, held a 40-meter lead most of the way. But then Pariani came roaring off the final turn, passed Branche with 20 meters to go and earned his second victory. Afterward Pariani, a swimming-pool builder from Lake Helen, Fla., said, "I've known Branche since 1969, and he and I are tremendously competitive."

"He's the one who competes." said Branche with a sniff. "I just give him someone to compete against."

As Branche spoke, Tammy Haley, a 36-year-old phys-ed teacher, used his bike to beat her Plainfield neighbor and friend Carolyn Carter in the women's 1,200-meter hard-tire safety race. When asked whether he would take part in other races, Branche replied, "I have a machine. It's that red boneshaker there. But I'm not going to race it."

So it was that the 1,200-meter boneshaker race featured only one entrant—Steve Carter. Boneshakers, made in the late 1860s and early '70s, were the first pedal-driven bicycles and were so called because of the torturous ride their wooden wheels provided. But Carter's three solo laps in the boneshaker event were surely a treat compared with the skullshaker awaiting him in the 200.

The six highwheel sprints combined high wheels with high speed to create high drama and, as anyone who saw Carter's spill would acknowledge, high anxiety. The four cyclists in the 1,600-meter Eagle Flying Start began the race in mounted position and already in motion. Within a few seconds Jamie Woodward opened a huge lead, and he went on to victory, beating Dean Nicholson by 200 meters. In his next event Woodward rode an Ordinary to win the 200 heat that was the downfall of Carter and Gabrick. Meanwhile, Lora Woodward, who was also riding an Ordinary, won the women's 200 meters and the women's one-mile race.

Last on the schedule was the IVCA championships" showcase event, the men's one-mile Ordinary final. The six-rider field jockeyed for position in a three-by-three pack for the first three laps. Then, at the bell, 44-year-old Zbynek Simek of Czechoslovakia, by far the smallest man (5'6") in the field and hence riding the smallest bike, broke away to beat Jack Castor by 30 yards. Graber, who apparently never stops pedaling, came in third.

An equipment manager at the Faculty of Sport in Brno, Simek was a member of the Czechoslovakian national cycling team in 1971. His victory in Findlay augurs well for the 1993 world championships and rally, which will take place in Prague, where the IVCA member club that will host the event is 110 years old. In the meantime the Wheelmen will gather next summer in White River Junction, Vt., for their annual meet.

Steve Carter, who won the Hard Luck Award in Findlay and is perhaps a little wiser for wear, is looking forward to the gathering. "This year I took 10 bikes to the rally, and I hardly had any time to socialize," he says. "Next year I'm going to ride to White River Junction and just socialize and relax."
User avatar
survivingworldsteam
 
Posts: 871
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Penny Farthing

Postby survivingworldsteam on Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:43 am

A good place to see highwheelers/penny farthings in action is at Dickens-on-the-Strand every December on Galveston Island. I forgot till this week that I had taken pictures of them back in 2004; here is one of them:

Image

The one closest to the camera appears to be riding an actual antique highwheeler; at the original resolution, you can see the spoon brake on the front, and the straight forks. The parts appear to be nickel-plated, correct for the late 1800s; the replicas in the background have chrome plated parts, a modern steering tube instead of a headstock, and no brakes.
User avatar
survivingworldsteam
 
Posts: 871
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Texas


Return to Technological History

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests